Innovation needs patents reform

By W. Kingston. 2001

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

APPROPRIABILITY OF INNOVATION RESULTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS (2007, methodology): “Firstly, the size of the company is a companyspecific characteristic that is often used in previous studies (Arundel and Kabla, 1998; Cohen et al., 2000; Arundel, 2001; Brouwer and Kleinkenecht, 2001; Hall y Ziedonis, 2001; Kingston, 2001).”
Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look (2003, unknown): “20 Kingston (2001, p. 408) explained that: “In complex technologies the motivation for firms’ extensive use of patents is, therefore, quite different from that of firms in simple technologies.”
Models of knowledge and systems of governance (2005, background): “The role of the State in the provision of inputs for dynamic coordination can now be fully appreciated.”
Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany (2006, background): “Defensive blockade is the case when firms patent in order to prevent their own technological room to manoeuvre being reduced by the patents of others (Arundel and Patel, 2003; Kingston, 2001).”
The Business Governance of Localized Knowledge: An Information Economics Approach for the Economics of Knowledge (2006, background): “The role of the judiciary system with respect to the enforcement conditions of the contracts for disembodied technological knowledge is also most relevant (Anand and Tarun, 2000; Kingston, 2001).”