Political uncertainty and the earmarking of environmental taxes
By C. Brett, Michael Keen. 2000
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b21245bd0101242509474bdead9c8f8efd7de7f0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Tax Deductions, Environmental Policy, and the (2000, unknown): “Some recent public choice analyses suggest that at least part of new revenues sources are likely to be used for public spending (Becker and Mulligan (1997), Brett and Keen (1998)).”
- Theoretical perspectives on resource tax design (2009, background): “The potential advantage of earmarking, on the other hand—stressed by Collier (2009) in discussing recent experiences in Africa, and formalized by Brett and Keen (2000)—is that it can limit politicians’ ability to divert revenue to their own purposes (though they may also prove adept in turning…”