Megafauna extinction, tree species range reduction, and carbon storage in Amazonian forests

By Christopher E. Doughty, A. Wolf, N. Morueta‐Holme, P. M. Jørgensen, Brody Sandel, C. Violle, B. Boyle, Nathan J B Kraft, Robert K. Peet, Brian J. Enquist and 3 more. 2016

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

During the Late Pleistocene and early Holocene 59 species of South American megafauna went extinct. Their extinction potentially triggered population declines of large-seeded tree species dispersed by the large-bodied frugivores with which they co-evolved, a theory first proposed by Janzen and Martin (1982). We tested this hypothesis using species range maps for 257 South American tree species, comparing 63 species thought to be primarily distributed by megafauna with 194 distributed by other animals. We found a highly significant (p 95% following disperser extinction. A numerical gap dynamic simulations suggests that over a 10 000 yr period following the disperser extinctions, the average convex hull range size of large-seeded tree species decreased by ∼ 31%, while the estimated decrease in population size was ∼ 54%, indicating a likely greater decrease in species population size than indicated by the empirical range patterns. Finally, we found a positive correlation between seed size and wood density of animal-dispersed tree species implying that the Late Pleistocene and early Holocene megafaunal extinctions reduced carbon content in the Amazon by ∼ 1.5 ± 0.7%. In conclusion, we 1) provide some empirical evidence that megafauna distributed fruit species have a smaller mean range size than wind, water or other animal-dispersed species, 2) demonstrate mathematically that such range reductions are expected from megafauna extinctions ca 12 000 yr ago, and 3) illustrate that these extinctions may have reduced the Amazon's carbon storage capacity.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b20a87062b539491c892c2188f314fadef2c5128

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

  1. Jamie Lorimer
  2. Maan Barua
  3. P. Jepson

In Ecology

  1. K. Kirby
  2. Jamie Lorimer
  3. Christopher E. Doughty
  4. P. Jepson

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. K. Kirby
  2. Jamie Lorimer
  3. Maan Barua
  4. P. Jepson
  5. T. Rooney

Citations in the corpus