Conservation Incentives Programs for Endangered Species: An Analysis of Landowner Participation

By Christian Langpap. Land Economics, 2004

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1df326b5e61a5689e7d4b424288a1e3a98a9df8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. B. Bravo-Ureta
2. R. Quiroga
3. D. Solís
4. Gareth D. Lennox
5. N. Hanley
6. P. Armsworth
7. Simanti Banerjee
8. C. Spash

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Gareth D. Lennox
2. N. Hanley
3. P. Armsworth
4. Simanti Banerjee

Citations in the corpus

• Technical Efficiency among Peasant Farmers Participating in Natural Resource Management Programmes in Central America (2009, background): “3 However, previous research suggests that soil conservation adoption is a choice variable and thus might be correlated with the error term in equation (5) (Jones, 2002; Langpap, 2004).”
• How should we incentivize private landowners to ‘produce’ more biodiversity? (2012, result): “Similar results have been found by Langpap (2004) for AES programmes in Oregon and Washington in the US.”