The Monte Carlo Event Generator DPMJET-III

By S. Roesler, Ralph Engel, J. Ranft. 2000

474 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A new version of the Monte Carlo event generator DPMJET is presented. It is a code system based on the Dual Parton Model and unifies all features of the DTUNUC-2, DPMJET-II and PHOJET1.12 event generators. DPMJET-III allows the simulation of hadron-hadron, hadron-nucleus, nucleus-nucleus, photon-hadron, photonphoton and photon-nucleus interactions from a few GeV up to the highest cosmic ray energies.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1dd034640e613146f51c1a97da70c9d6445a7bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

The physics models of FLUKA: status and recent development (2003, background): “ANS Radiation Protection & Shielding Division 12th Topical Meeting, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, April 14–18 2002, (6 pages, published in electronic format) [25] S. Roesler, R. Engel and J. Ranft, The Monte Carlo Event Generator DPMJET-III, Proc.”
Multiplicity dependence of the average transverse momentum in pp, p-Pb, and Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC (2013, methodology): “The efﬁciency and purity of the primary charged-particle selection are estimated from a Monte Carlo simulation using DPMJET [38] as an event generator with particle transport through the ALICE detector using GEANT3 [39].”
Long-range angular correlations on the near and away side in p-Pb collisions at root S-NN=5.02 TeV (2012, methodology): “The efficiency and purity of the primary charged-particle selection are estimated from a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using the DPMJET event generator [46] (for p–Pb) and the PYTHIA 6.”
Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies (2019, unknown): “…Sibyll (Engel et al., 1992, 2017; Fletcher et al., 1994; Ahn et al., 2009; Riehn et al., 2016; Fedynitch et al., 2018), and DPMJET (Ranft, 1995; Roesler et al., 2001) for high-energy interactions, typically with a laboratory frame momentum larger than 100 GeV, and FLUKA (Ferrari et al., 2005;…”
The Forward Physics Facility: Sites, experiments, and physics potential (2021, methodology): “QCD-centered generators more common in osmic-ray studies, such as Sibyll [193], QGSJET [363], DMPJET [194], and EPOS [364], generally are better tuned in the orward region.”
Invited review: Physics potential of the ICAL detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) (2015, methodology): “is work is based on Refs. [5] and [100]. The primary cosmic ray ux model based on AMS [169] and BESS [170, 171] data has been used, and the hadronic interactions have been implemented with DPMJET-III [172] above 32 GeV, and JAM below 32 GeV. For the propagation of cosmic rays in the atmosphere, the ”
Long-range angular correlations of pi, K and p in p-Pb collisions at root s(NN)=5.02 TeV (2013, methodology): “…and purity of the primary charged-particle selection are estimated from a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using the DPMJET version 3.05 event generator [66] with particle transport through the detector using GEANT3 [67] version 3.21 which contains an improved description of the ¯p inelastic cross…”