Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis (2008, background): “…Rao & Battese, 1998; El Mahgary & Lahdelma, 1995; Flegg & Allen, 2007; Friedman & Sinuany-Stern, 1997; Haksever &Muragishi, 1998; Johnes, 2006a; Worthington & Lee, 2008), little work has been done on measuring the efficiency in producing any of the outputs of higher education institutions…”
Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios (2008, background): “11 By a similar line of reasoning, the two estimated frontiers are much closer to each other in the region of the input–output combinations used by, for example, Australia. using panel data.”
Efficiency and Productivity Change in the English Higher Education Sector from 1996/97 to 2004/5 (2008, background): “While technology change has been found to be an important component of Malmquist productivity change in other studies of higher education (Flegg et al., 2004; Worthington and Lee, 2007), the finding of negative technical efficiency change is new.”
Beyond frontiers: comparing the efficiency of higher education decision‐making units across more than one country (2009, background): “Worthington and Lee ( 2005 ) examine these changes in the Australian university sector between 1998 and 2003.”