Using the t‐distribution to improve the absolute structure assignment with likelihood calculations

By Rob W. W. Hooft, L. Straver, A. Spek. 2010

80 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1c8803f95dbfa61d99904b42501baee63b5bbae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. G. Sheldrick
2. Trixie Wagner
3. S. Parsons
4. H. Flack
5. A. Spek
6. A. Coelho

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Parsons
2. Trixie Wagner
3. H. Flack
4. A. Spek

In Spectroscopy

1. S. Parsons
2. Trixie Wagner
3. H. Flack
4. A. Spek

Citations in the corpus

• Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement (2013, methodology): “The methods published elsewhere by Hooft et al. (2008, 2010), Thompson & Watkin (2011) and Parsons, Wagner et al. (2012) and those described below attempt to obtain more realistic uncertainty estimates.”
• PLATON SQUEEZE: a tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors. (2015, background): “…TwinRotMat for automatic detection of twinning, ADDSYM for the detection of missed and pseudosymmetry, BIJVOET for absolute structure determination (Hooft et al., 2008, 2010), an extensive assortment of geometric calculations (bonds, angles, torsion angles, least-squares planes, ring puckering and…”