A new method of feature fusion and its application in image recognition
By Quansen Sun, Shenggen Zeng, Yan Liu, P. Heng, D. Xia. Pattern Recognition, 2005
504 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b199ba1eb6b0b1b974815538de914d7f1683d6a8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Tao A. Xiang
- Yongxin Yang
- Yi-Zhe Song
- Xiatian Zhu
- Timothy M. Hospedales
- Yi Yang
- Luc Van Gool
- Yu Qiao
Citations in the corpus
- A Review of Human Activity Recognition Methods (2015, methodology): “, 2004) was widely studied in the literature as an effective way for fusing data at the feature level (Sun et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2011c; Rudovic et al., 2013).”
- A Feature Fusion Based Forecasting Model for Financial Time Series (2014, methodology): “In [53], a feature fusion framework is proposed, adopting the idea of CCA for pattern recognition.”
- A Survey of Decision Fusion and Feature Fusion Strategies for Pattern Classification (2010, methodology): “Feature fusion [16,17] can be divided into the following methods, namely, feature ranking, selection, feature extraction, and feature combination.”
- Deep Feature Fusion for VHR Remote Sensing Scene Classification (2017, methodology): “As developed in [38], the combination between the transformed features is performed by concatenation or summation as follows:”
- Discriminant Correlation Analysis: Real-Time Feature Level Fusion for Multimodal Biometric Recognition (2016, methodology): “Recently, feature fusion based on Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) [9] has attracted the attention in the area of multimodal recognition.”
- Stochastic Classifiers for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (2020, methodology): “Testing-stage Prediction Previous methods with multiple classifiers usually resort to the feature/score fusion or voting by majority [17, 51] for a final decision.”