Gender Discrimination and Evaluators’ Gender: Evidence from Italian Academia

By M. Paola, Vincenzo Scoppa. 2015

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1980e4fe467297fb79a1f6e4e1d05892e2ed191

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. M. Sylos-Labini
2. N. Zinovyeva
3. Manuel F. Bagüés
4. Barbara Petrongolo
5. Daniel S. Hamermesh
6. Ghazala Azmat
7. Eran Yashiv
8. Yves Zenou

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Barbara Petrongolo
2. Manuel F. Bagüés
3. Daniel S. Hamermesh
4. Ghazala Azmat
5. Stephen P. Jenkins
6. L. Osberg

Citations in the corpus

• Gender and the Labor Market: What Have We Learned from Field and Lab Experiments? (2014, background): “On the other hand, the field experiment by De Paola et al. (2013) on Italian undergraduate students in economics finds no evidence of gender differences in students’ willingness to enter a tournament evaluation scheme, or in their performance within the tournament. Workplace consequences of competit”
• Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter? (2017, background): “…Casadevall and Handelsman (2013) Selection of conference speakers Microbiology Identification based on observables 1,845 Same-sex preference De Paola and Scoppa (2015) Job applicants Economics and Chemistry Identification based on observables 2,279 Same-sex preference Williams and Ceci (2015)…”
• Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses and Impacts (2018, methodology): “Using GS data, de Paola and Scoppa (2015) showed that selections by boards of examiners for appointments as associate or full professor in Italy are very sensitive to the candidates’ h-statistics.”