Measurement of Depressive Rumination and Associated Constructs

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metacognitive Therapy in Recurrent and Persistent Depression: A Multiple-Baseline Study of a New Treatment (2009, methodology): “It has high internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 (see Luminet 2004, for review), and a test-retest correlation of 0.67 over 12 months (NolenHoeksema et al. 1999).”
A roadmap to rumination: A review of the definition, assessment, and conceptualization of this multifaceted construct (2008, background): “• Not related to other indices of more anxiety related thought (such as the Emotion Control Questionnaire) (Luminet, 2004).”
The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): Validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking (2011, methodology): “Existing measures of RNT have been criticized as being highly contentdependent (see Ehring & Watkins, 2008; Luminet, 2004; Treynor et al., 2003).”
A Comparison of Formal and Informal Mindfulness Programs for Stress Reduction in University Students (2015, background): “The RRS is considered a reliable and valid measure of rumination (Luminet 2004).”
Rethinking Rumination (2008, background): “3 Other measures of rumination—in particular, those assessing a perseverative focus on the self and one’s problems—have demonstrated similar links to depression (Luminet, 2004; Mor & Winquist, 2002; Siegle, Moore, & Thase, 2004).”