Worst and best-case coverage in sensor networks

By S. Megerian, Farinaz Koushanfar, Miodrag Potkonjak, Mani B. Srivastava. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2005

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b17faa4ae6bc2f6d1286dfb9059c7b11178bfa89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Ali Gökhan Yavuz
2. Christian Bettstetter
3. Evsen Yanmaz
4. M. A. Güvensan
5. Paolo Santi
6. Zygmunt J. Haas
7. Tara Small
8. Sushant Jain

Citations in the corpus

• Survey on Contemporary Remote Surveillance Systems for Public Safety (2010, background): “For a trilateration to be successful, a node needs to have at least three neighbors who already are aware of their positions [38].”
• On coverage issues in directional sensor networks: A survey (2011, background): “There are extensive number of studies about the coverage problem in omni-directional sensor networks [2–5].”
• Drone networks: Communications, coordination, and sensing (2018, background): “In static wireless sensor networks, in general, the coverage problem is treated as a node-activation and scheduling problem (see [28],[29],[30]).”