Boundary conditions at a planar fluid–porous interface for a Poiseuille flow

By M. Chandesris, D. Jamet. 2006

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b17859fe5cdbc1cca7c151bc2d6bffd881909816

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Francesco dell'Isola
2. A. Madeo
3. B. Goyeau
4. Francisco J. Valdes-Parada
5. J. Alberto Ochoa-Tapia
6. C. G. Aguilar-Madera
7. Pierre Seppecher
8. Ivan Giorgio

In Computational Mechanics

1. B. Goyeau
2. Francisco J. Valdes-Parada
3. Francesco dell'Isola
4. J. Alberto Ochoa-Tapia
5. C. G. Aguilar-Madera
6. Iryna Rybak
7. Bernd Flemisch
8. Pierre Seppecher

Citations in the corpus

• A coupling concept for two‐phase compositional porous‐medium and single‐phase compositional free flow (2011, background): “Interface descriptions: (a) REV scale: velocity profile for coupled free flow (single-phase Stokes equations) and porous-medium flow (multiphase Darcy’s law), (b) micro/pore scale : the distribution of all phases and pore sizes is resolved, (c) interface description either as a transition zone with ”
• Boundary Conditions at Fluid-Permeable Interfaces in Porous Media: a Variational Approach (2009, methodology): “(26) Here, ∂A/∂q and ∂R/∂q̇t must be understood in the sense of functional differentiation.”
• Velocity and stress jump conditions between a porous medium and a fluid (2013, methodology): “Note that the integrals of these deviations have been previously identified, in the context of matched asymptotic expansion method, as excess quantities [22,15,14].”