Winners and Losers: Assessing the Distributional Impact of Privatization

310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Remittances and Development: Lessons from Latin America (2008, background): “For instance, Chong and López-de-Silanes (2005) looked at all types of privatization, not just infrastructure, as did Birdsall and Nellis (2003). Ros and Baneerjee (2000) analyzed 23 countries in Latin America to evaluate the relationship between privatization, network expansion, and efficiency in t”
Perception of risks in renewable energy projects: The case of concentrated solar power in North Africa (2012, unknown): “In some cases efficiency gains were achieved at societal expense, namely lower salaries for workers, higher costs for consumers, and a lower quality of goods and services (Birdsall and Nellis, 2002; Bayliss, 2002).”
Recent trends in inequality and poverty in developing countries (2013, unknown): “The economic liberalization also triggered changes in the sectorial structure of the economy; in particular the ensuing de-industrialization during the transition is linked to an increase in inequality (Ferreira, 1999, Milanovic, 1999, Ivaschenko, 2002; Birdsall and Nellis 2003). Milanovic and Ersad”
Privatisation Results: Private Sector Participation in Water Services After 15 Years (2006, background): “Birdsall and Nellis (2003) show that privatisation has indeed worsened asset and income distribution, and increased inequality.”