The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole

By Ahmed Almheiri, Netta Engelhardt, D. Marolf, Henry Maxfield. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019

874 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Bulk quantum fields are often said to contribute to the generalized entropy A4GN+Sbulk\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \frac{A}{4{G}_N}+{S}_{\mathrm{bulk}} $$\end{document} only at O(1). Nonetheless, in the context of evaporating black holes, O(1/GN ) gradients in Sbulk can arise due to large boosts, introducing a quantum extremal surface far from any classical extremal surface. We examine the effect of such bulk quantum effects on quantum extremal surfaces (QESs) and the resulting entanglement wedge in a simple two-boundary 2d bulk system defined by Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity coupled to a 1+1 CFT. Turning on a coupling between one boundary and a further external auxiliary system which functions as a heat sink allows a two-sided otherwise-eternal black hole to evaporate on one side. We find the generalized entropy of the QES to behave as expected from general considerations of unitarity, and in particular that ingoing information disappears from the entanglement wedge after a scambling time β2πlogΔS+O1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \frac{\beta }{2\pi}\log \varDelta S+O(1) $$\end{document} in accord with expectations for holographic implementations of the Hayden-Preskill protocol. We also find an interesting QES phase transition at what one might call the Page time for our process.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1605237c94039cc8f1264b7d8c5d94abc673a54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. S. Raju
  2. D. Stanford
  3. R. Myers
  4. J. Maldacena
  5. S. Shenker
  6. Ahmed Almheiri
  7. A. Karch
  8. H. Chen

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Raju
  2. R. Myers
  3. D. Stanford
  4. J. Maldacena
  5. D. Harlow
  6. S. Shenker
  7. Thomas Hartman
  8. H. Chen

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. S. Raju
  2. D. Stanford
  3. R. Myers
  4. J. Maldacena
  5. S. Shenker
  6. D. Harlow
  7. Thomas Hartman
  8. H. Chen

Citations in the corpus