Terror management in Japan

By Steven J. Heine, Motoko Harihara, Y. Niiya. 2002

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the Unique Psychological Import of the Human Awareness of Mortality: Theme and Variations (2006, unknown): “TMT supportive studies have used samples from non-Western societies such as Iran, Japan, and Australian Aboriginal culture (eg, Halloran & Kashima, 2004 ; Heine, Harihara, & Niiya, 2002 ; Pyszczynski et al, 2006 ).”
Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. (2004, background): “ences into the self, leads to less of a need to defend self-esteem than extrinsic self-esteem, that is more dependent on the introjection of externally imposed values (Arndt, Schimel, Greenberg, & Pyszczynski, 2002; Schimel, Arndt, Banko, & Cook, 2004; Schimel et al., 2001). For a discussion of thes”
Psychological universals: what are they and how can we know? (2005, methodology): “A third challenge facing the cross-cultural study method is to broaden the scope of psychological variables under investigation sufficiently so that many culture-specific conceptions of the variable are not missed.”
The effects of personal and collective mortality salience on individualism: Comparing Australians and Japanese with higher and lower self-esteem (2004, background): “Heine, Harihara, and Niiya (2002) found evidence in Japan that personal mortality salience exacerbated the rejection of an essay that criticized traditional Japanese culture, consistent with the standard terror management findings from North America.”