Knowledge Infusion
By Leslie G. Valiant. 2006
67 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mark Bun
- Uri Stemmer
- Kobbi Nissim
- Vitaly Feldman
- Jonathan Ullman
- Thomas Steinke
- Gautam Kamath
- Jayadev Acharya
Citations in the corpus
- Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoning (2019, background): “The integration of learning and reasoning through neural-symbolic computing has been an active branch of AI research for several years [14, 16, 17, 21, 25, 42, 53].”
- Simultaneous Private Learning of Multiple Concepts (2015, background): “[28] L. G. Valiant.”
- AI Reasoning Systems: PAC and Applied Methods (2018, background): “inciple of explicit rules (and also require the form of the rules to be given). Valiant even brings up this issue in his original Knowledge Infusion paper and brings up 3 reasons in defense of rules. [19] 1. Chaining rules allows the algorithm to make inference about situations too infrequent to hav”
- Neurosymbolic AI: the 3rd wave (2020, unknown): “Neural-symbolic computing has been an active area of research seeking to establish such a bridge for several years [4, 26, 16, 20, 35, 43, 80, 93].”
- Propositional Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Restricted Boltzmann Machines. (2017, background): “Despite their difference, there is a strong argument that combination of the two should offer joint benefits (Smolensky 1995; Valiant 2006; Garcez, Lamb, and Gabbay 2008).”