Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: lessons learned and policy futures.

By E. Boyd, N. Hultman, J. Roberts, E. Corbera, J. Cole, Alexander S. Bozmoski, J. Ebeling, Robert Tippman, Philip Mann, K. Brown and 1 more. 2009

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rights to Land, Forests and Carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica (2011, background): “In the former case, the government could even decide to retain some of the benefits from REDD+ local projects by, for example, taxing transactions as some countries have done in the case of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol [43].”
Evolution of international carbon markets: lessons for the Paris Agreement (2019, methodology): “…period was now assessed empirically and supported by a text analysis of 744 PDDs submitted until May 2006 (Olsen & Fenhann, 2008), an assessment of 40 projects from India (Alexeew et al., 2010), and small samples of 16 (Sutter & Parreño, 2007) and 10 projects (Boyd et al., 2009), respectively.”
Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: towards multi-level climate justice (2014, background): “…of CDM projects (Olsen, 2007; Sirohi, 2007; Subbarao & Lloyd, 2011; Sutter & Parreño, 2007), as well as case studies of CDM projects (Böhm & Dabhi, 2009; Boyd et al., 2009; da Cunha, Walter, & Rei, 2007), have concluded that they have often failed to contribute to local sustainable development.”