On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox

By R. Mcweeny. 2000

523 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b14689c0d521a79b89f458561e0c3c0dbbbea77c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Renato Renner
2. Roger Colbeck
3. Marco Tomamichel
4. Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
5. Omar Fawzi
6. Stephanie Wehner
7. Juan Carlos García-Escartín
8. Miguel Herrero-Collantes

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Roger Colbeck
2. Renato Renner
3. Fernando G. S. L. Brandão
4. Marco Tomamichel
5. Omar Fawzi
6. Martin Bodo Plenio
7. Mark M. Wilde
8. Juan Carlos García-Escartín

In Spectroscopy

1. Roger Colbeck
2. Renato Renner

Citations in the corpus

• Quantum random number generators (2016, unknown): “John Bell showed that the contradiction could be settled experimentally (Bell, 1964).”
• Free randomness can be amplified (2011, methodology): “Our work also connects to the so-called “free will” theorem of Conway and Kochen [27, 28], which is, in essence, a combination of Bell’s theorem [4] and the KochenSpecker theorem [29].”