Testing the potential of an elevated temperature IRSL signal from K-feldspar

672 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

DRAC: Dose Rate and Age Calculator for trapped charge dating (2015, background): “Huntley and Baril, 1997) and the recent development of the post-IR IRSL protocol (Buylaert et al., 2009; Thomsen et al., 2008) and technological advances that facilitate single-grain K-feldspar dating, have resulted in efforts to precisely measure individual-grain internal K contents (e.”
Review and assessment of the potential of post-IR IRSL dating methods to circumvent the problem of anomalous fading in feldspar luminescence (2014, methodology): “For the pIRIR(50,225) signal, an average recuperation value of 3.47 ± 0.13% (n = 183) was obtained by Buylaert et al. (2009).”
Optical dating in archaeology: thirty years in retrospect and grand challenges for the future (2015, methodology): “…and other factors (Huntley and Lian, 258 2006; Kars et al., 2008; Li and Li, 2008), but procedures have been developed recently that can access traps 259 that fade much less (Thomsen et al., 2008; Buylaert et al., 2009, 2012a) or do not fade at all (Li and Li, 2011; 260 Li et al., 2014a, 2014b).”