Are We Planning for Sustainable Development?
By Philip Berke, M. Conroy. 2000
778 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b13188de5bdacff7a56c2ace54d1fc13f18a17be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Theory and Practice in Planning the Suburbs: Challenges to Implementing New Urbanism, Smart Growth, and Sustainability Principles1 (2009, background): “The language of “sustainability” appears widely in North American urban development discourse (Berke & Conroy, 2000; Grant, 1994a).”
- Perceived security of women in relation to their path choice toward sustainable neighborhood in Santiago, Chile (2017, background): “…future generations through a combination of environmental protection, social development, and economic prosperity, which leads to an improvement in the quality of human life (Berke & Conroy, 2000; Cozens, 2002; Cozens, Hillier, & Prescott, 1999; Du Plessis, 1999; Knights, Pascoe, & Henchley, 2002).”
- Does Sustainable Development Offer a New Direction for Planning? Challenges for the Twenty-First Century (2002, background): “Properly trained volunteers are better able to set up a much more complete sampling strategy than is possible for most public agencies and can provide data that are as reliable as data provided by paid professionals (Berke et al. 2000).”
- City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California's Central Valley (2009, background): “The index is constructed in the spirit of previous work that quantifies how well local plans express sustainability principles ( Berke & Conroy, 2000 ; Conroy & Berke, 2004 ; Jepson, 2004 ).”
- Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure (2009, background): “Some have argued that the existing definitions of sustainable development are vague (Gow, 1992; Mozaffar, 2001), devoid of operative definitions (Villanueva, 1997), and fraught with contradictions (Redclift, 1987), and that the topic itself is confused (Berke & Conroy, 2000; Redclift, 1994).”
- Smart Growth and Urban Development Pattern: A Comparative Study (2005, background): “As Berke and Conroy (2000, 31) have argued, “However, increasing density is not a panacea.”