Home-range Size and Habitat Used by the Northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis)

By S. Owen, M. Menzel, W. Ford, B. Chapman, Karl V. Miller, John W. Edwards, Petra Bohall Wood. 2003

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural–urban gradient (2008, background): “Because bat activity typically is higher near water sources than in upland areas, we also classified each sampling site as a water or non-water site (Grindal et al. 1999; Owen et al. 2004).”
Relating bat species presence to simple habitat measures in a central Appalachian forest (2005, background): “…these shortfalls to some extent and allowed us to acoustically confirm the forest-obligate habits congruent with the acoustical surveys in Canada (Patriquin and Barclay, 2003) along with radio-telemetry studies of the M. septentrionalis near the FEF landscape (Owen et al., 2002; Owen et al., 2003).”
Movements and Resource Selection of the Northern Long-eared Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) in a Forest–Agriculture Landscape (2008, background): “Females tracked by Broders et al. (2006) and Owen et al. (2003) also used larger foraging areas (46 ha and 65 ha, respectively) than those on PEI (6.0 ha).”