Exposure to media-portrayed thin-ideal images adversely affects vulnerable girls: A longitudinal experiment.

By Eric Stice, D. Spangler, W. Agras. 2001

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Museology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b110712752b9b7d783567c1311c9eb1d9b2adf07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Museology

Citations in the corpus

Influence of Mass Media on Body Image and Eating Disordered Attitudes and Behaviors in Females: A Review of Effects and Processes (2010, background): “The important issue of external validity was also addressed by Stice, Spangler, and Agras (2001).”
The role of media exposure in adolescent girls' body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness: prospective results (2006, result): “This is consistent with the results of previous investigations of adolescent girls over a similar time span (Jones, 2004; Stice et al., 2001; Stice & Whitenton, 2002; Vaughan & Fouts, 2003) and suggests that body image may have stabilized by the time girls enter high school.”
Exposure to Sexually Objectifying Media and Body Self-Perceptions among College Women: An Examination of the Selective Exposure Hypothesis and the Role of Moderating Variables (2006, background): “The findings of the present study can be interpreted in the same light as the results of the longitudinal experiment by Stice et al. (2001) , who found that long-term exposure”
Longer-term implications of responsiveness to 'thin-ideal' television: support for a cumulative hypothesis of body image disturbance (2003, background): “Experimental studies to date have been criticized for their lack of ecological validity (Irving, 2001; Levine & Smolak, 1996; Stice et al., 2001), and we do not argue that our one single experimental manipulation was causal in the development of the observed increase in body dissatisfaction among ad”
Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: A meta-analytic review. (2009, background): “…(2006) 287 Male 12.9 Student Correlational Measured Unspecified 0.345 Stice & Shaw (1994) 157 Female 19 Student Experimental Inferred Images 0.303 Stice et al. (2001) 219 Female 14.1 Student Experimental Inferred Images 0.100 Stormer & Thompson (1996) 162 Female 23.5 Student Correlational…”