Impact of lakeshore development on green frog abundance

By J. Woodford, M. Meyer. 2003

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b101944dd9aabbfa6de3c576caab8be36348a6e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Mazerolle
2. Alysa Remsburg
3. M. Smith
4. D. Green
5. Monica G. Turner
6. A. Desrochers
7. Brett R. Scheffers
8. C. Paszkowski

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Smith
2. D. Green
3. Monica G. Turner
4. A. Desrochers
5. Brett R. Scheffers
6. C. Paszkowski
7. M. Mazerolle
8. R. D. Semlitsch

Citations in the corpus

• Aquatic and terrestrial drivers of dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages within and among north-temperate lakes (2009, background): “Those structural changes might have consequences for a variety of animals in both the riparian and littoral (near-shore aquatic) zones (Bryan and Scarnecchia 1992, Schindler et al. 2000, Lindsay et al. 2002, Woodford and Meyer 2003, Butler and DeMay-nadier 2008, Henning and Remsburg, in press).”
• The effects of urbanization on North American amphibian species: Identifying new directions for urban conservation (2012, background): “... USA A 8 22 Pearl et al. 2005 Oregon, USA A & C 6 23 Pillsbury and Miller 2008 Iowa, USA A 7 24 Price et al. 2006 North Carolina, USA C 2 25 Reinelt et al. 1998 Washington, USA A & C 10 26 Riley et al. 2005 California, USA A & C 5 27 Rubbo and Kiesecker 2005 Pennsylvania, USA A & C 11 28 Skidds e”
• Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation : are all amphibian populations metapopulations? (2005, background): “…scenario of limited dispersal, Condition 3 (limited dispersal with the potential for recolonisation), was coded as assumed if there was an implication in the manuscript text that dispersal beyond a certain distance was expected to be impossible (Conroy and Brook 2003, Woodford and Meyer 2003).”
• Landscape resistance to frog movements (2005, background): “Although common in the study area, both species are sensitive to changes in the landscape resulting from urban development, forestry, agriculture, and peat-mining activities (Bonin et al. 1997; Knutson et al. 1999; Kolozsvary and Swihart 1999; Mazerolle 2001, 2003; Woodford and Meyer 2003).”