Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: a critical review

By J. Schloss, M. Murray. 2011

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0f041f4856bffdd867afbf99b9f80e04fe74cd0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ara Norenzayan
2. Joseph Henrich
3. Benjamin G. Purzycki
4. Dimitris Xygalatas
5. Aiyana K. Willard

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Joseph Henrich
2. Emma Cohen
3. Ara Norenzayan
4. Benjamin G. Purzycki
5. Quentin D. Atkinson
6. Dimitris Xygalatas
7. C. Apicella
8. L. Sugiyama

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joseph Henrich
2. Aiyana K. Willard
3. Benjamin G. Purzycki
4. Ara Norenzayan
5. Quentin D. Atkinson
6. Emma Cohen
7. Dimitris Xygalatas
8. C. Apicella

Citations in the corpus

• The evolution of religion and morality: a synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies (2017, background): “…Hypothesis predicts that fear and/or perception of supernatural retribution for various selfish behaviors curbs those behaviors, thus minimizing the need for costly punishment by other people (Johnson, 2005, RELIGION, BRAIN & BEHAVIOR 105 2011, 2014; Johnson & Krüger, 2004; Schloss & Murray, 2011).”