Family income and children's education: Using the Norwegian oil boom as a natural experiment
By K. Løken. 2010
128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0de1f5c7840778ab8c7e66ae04898fcc5b31003
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- What Linear Estimators Miss: The Effects of Family Income on Child Outcomes (2011, methodology): “In addition, we follow Løken (2010) in exploiting regional and time variation in the economic boom that followed the initial discovery of oil in Norway, as the instrument for family income.”
- 2017-03 Early and Late Human Capital Investments, Borrowing Constraints, and the Family (2012, unknown): “…studies demonstrate that exogenous increases in family income lead to real increases in child investments and improvements in child development (Løken 2010, Duncan, Morris and Rodrigues 2011, Milligan and Stabile 2011, Dahl and Lochner 2012, Løken, Mogstad and Wiswall 2012, Jones, et al. 2015).”
- Credit Constraints in Education (2011, unknown): “More generally, recent studies show that exogenous increases in family income lead to improvements in early child development (e.g. Løken 2010, Løken, Mogstad and Wiswall 2010, Duncan, Morris and Rodrigues 2011, Milligan and Stabile 2011, and Dahl and Lochner, forthcoming).”
- The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit (2012, unknown): “[26] K.”
- Does Household Income Affect children’s Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Evidence (2020, background): “While no overall effects of the oil shock were identified by Løken (2010), Løken et al.’s (2012) follow-up study allows for non-linearities, finding significant effects for lower-income households.”
- No Child Left Behind: Subsidized Child Care and Children's Long-Run Outcomes (2011, unknown): “Also, the federal government used equalization transfers to redistribute income from rich to poor municipalities, such that local differences in revenues are largely offset (Løken, 2010).”