Magnetic Reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications

By Eric Priest, T. Forbes. 2000

1,179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0d6f773f01a2bc87ec01c87f2f09526886957ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

Citations in the corpus

Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November 18 (2005, methodology): “According to the standard theory of magnetic reconnection (see, e.g., Priest & Forbes 2000), the velocities of the blobs are either equal to VA if the plasma is incompressible or differ from VA by a factor of the square root of the plasma density of the inflow region compared with that of the…”
On Solving the Coronal Heating Problem (2005, background): “The Hall term in the generalized Ohm’s Law causes ions to decouple from the magnetic field whenever the current sheet is thinner than the ion skin depth, or ~ 103 cm in the corona (Priest and Forbes, 2000, Table 1.2).”
Slip-Running Reconnection in Quasi-Separatrix Layers (2006, methodology): “(as reviewed in Priest and Forbes, 2000). Global models involving the NP and the surrounding arcades, taking into account the geometry and the linetied boundary conditions, have been calculated so as to mimic solar observed phenomena (e.g. Yokoyama and Shibata, 1994; Karpen et al., 1998). One natura”
Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory (2004, background): “Again, we can here only refer to the text book by Priest and Forbes[28].”
Particle acceleration and kinematics in solar flares – A Synthesis of Recent Observations and Theoretical Concepts (Invited Review) (2002, background): “While most previous flare models with magnetic reconnection were restricted to Xtype configurations and current sheet geometries (with 2D nullpoints), recent flare studies involve also three-dimensional (3D) nullpoints [see, e.g., Priest and Forbes (2000), Chapter 8, for an introduction].”
Global Regularity for a Class of Generalized Magnetohydrodynamic Equations (2011, background): “The 3D MHD equations govern the dynamics of the velocity field u and the magnetic field b in electrically conducting fluids such as plasmas [2,16].”
Slow Solar Wind: Observations and Modeling (2016, positive): “Magnetic reconnection (Priest and Forbes 2000) is a key process in many scenarios that have been proposed to explain coronal processes.”
Dynamical and Physical Properties of a Post-Coronal Mass Ejection Current Sheet (2003, background): “& Forbes 2000) unless the magnetic configuration includes some neutral regions, such as neutral point, null point, current sheet, or quasi-separatrix layers (e.g., De ´moulin et al. 1996; Priest & Forbes 2000 ), in which the fast magnetic reconnection can occur easily.”
Solar Flares: Magnetohydrodynamic Processes (2011, background): “…can also find a well-described explanation of solar flares in the following books: Parker (1979), Parker (1994), Melrose (1980), Priest (1982), Zirin (1988), Stix (2004), Benz (1993), Tajima and Shibata (1997), Golub and Pasachoff (1997), Somov (2000), Priest and Forbes (2000), Aschwanden (2004).”
Generalized Squashing Factors for Covariant Description of Magnetic Connectivity in the Solar Corona (2007, background): “Subject headinggs: Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) — Sun: flares — Sun: magnetic fields”
Nonthermal Electrons in Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models of Sagittarius A* (2003, background): “A possible analog of the Chandra flares is solar flares, in which magnetic energy is converted into thermal energy, accelerated particles, and bulk kinetic energy, giving rise to a burst of radiation (e.g., Priest & Forbes 2000).”
The Formation of a Prominence in Active Region NOAA 8668. I. SOHO/MDI Observations of Magnetic Field Evolution (2001, positive): “According to Berger (1999) and Priest & Forbes (2000) , the rate of magnetic helicity change of the coronal volume due to the shuffling of footpoints on the surface S is given by”
Theories of solar eruptions: a review (2003, background): “The models are based on the injection is to increase the timescale of the flux mechanism of accumulating energy in the coronal injection. magnetic field, so they are thought of as the storage Chen et al. (2000) tried to inject the flux within model (Priest and Forbes, 2000).”