ℓ1-regularized linear regression: persistence and oracle inequalities
By Peter L. Bartlett, Shahar Mendelson, Joe Neeman. Probability theory and related fields, 2011
59 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0ce7754f5da615e31050d7ccd6777bb75757075
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Sourav Chatterjee
- Matthias Hein
- Shahar Mendelson
- Martin Slawski
- Jafar Jafarov
- Samet Oymak
- Jaouad Mourtada
- Alberto Abadie
In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
In Statistics and Probability
- Jafar Jafarov
- Sourav Chatterjee
- Matthias Hein
- Shahar Mendelson
- Martin Slawski
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Victor Chernozhukov
- Gábor Lugosi
Citations in the corpus
- Non-negative least squares for high-dimensional linear models: consistency and sparse recovery without regularization (2012, background): “The main result of the following section is a bound on the excess error of NNLS that resembles the so-called slow rate bound of the lasso [3, 8, 24].”
- Assumptionless consistency of the Lasso (2013, background): “Incidentally, the above theorem is related to the notion of persistence defined in [17] and thoroughly investigated in [1].”
- Prediction error of cross-validated Lasso (2015, background): “ive, especially since it has been observed in several recent papers that risk consistency in Lasso (with deterministic value of the tuning parameter) holds without any conditions on the design matrix [1, 3, 6, 27]. The goal of this paper is to address these issues and prove a new and better upper bo”
- Learning without Concentration (2014, background): “To illustrate the clear advantages Theorem 3.1 has over Theorem 1.1, we will present one example in which α∗N and β ∗ N may be computed in a relatively straightforward way: the persistence problem in n1 [Greenshtein and Ritov 2004; Greenshtein 2006; Bartlett et al. 2012].”