Serious Games and Gamification for Mental Health: Current Status and Promising Directions

By T. Fleming, Lynda M Bavin, K. Stasiak, Eve Hermansson-Webb, Sally N. Merry, Colleen Cheek, Mathijs F. G. Lucassen, Ho Ming Lau, B. Pollmuller, S. Hetrick. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2017

548 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Computer games are ubiquitous and can be utilized for serious purposes such as health and education. “Applied games” including serious games (in brief, computerized games for serious purposes) and gamification (gaming elements used outside of games) have the potential to increase the impact of mental health internet interventions via three processes. First, by extending the reach of online programs to those who might not otherwise use them. Second, by improving engagement through both game-based and “serious” motivational dynamics. Third, by utilizing varied mechanisms for change, including therapeutic processes and gaming features. In this scoping review, we aim to advance the field by exploring the potential and opportunities available in this area. We review engagement factors which may be exploited and demonstrate that there is promising evidence of effectiveness for serious games for depression from contemporary systematic reviews. We illustrate six major categories of tested applied games for mental health (exergames, virtual reality, cognitive behavior therapy-based games, entertainment games, biofeedback, and cognitive training games) and demonstrate that it is feasible to translate traditional evidence-based interventions into computer gaming formats and to exploit features of computer games for therapeutic change. Applied games have considerable potential for increasing the impact of online interventions for mental health. However, there are few independent trials, and direct comparisons of game-based and non-game-based interventions are lacking. Further research, faster iterations, rapid testing, non-traditional collaborations, and user-centered approaches are needed to respond to diverse user needs and preferences in rapidly changing environments.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0c42670b010085f3b104b284c42606c3eebf04b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
  2. Gavriel Salvendy

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah
  2. Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
  3. Keng Leng Siau
  4. Gavriel Salvendy
  5. James R. Lewis
  6. Xiaowen Fang

Citations in the corpus