Desempenho radicular de mudas de eucalipto produzidas em diferentes recipientes e substratos
By T. A. S. D. Freitas, D. G. Barroso, J. G. Carneiro, R. Penchel, K. Lamônica, Daniele de Alvarenga Ferreira. 2005
73 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance after the planting of eucalyptus stecklings, produced in different containers and substrates, with emphasis in root production and deformations. The stecklings were produced in tubes (50 cm3) and in pressed blocks (40 x 60 x 7cm -16800 cm3), and used as substrates: carbonized rice husk and eucalyptus husk; sugarcane bagasse and sugarcane filter cake; and peat. At ninety days the stecklings were transplanted to plastic bags (20 L), with soil from the planting area. This experiment was set in a completely randomized design, arranged in a 2 x 7factorial, constituted by two clones (natural hybrid of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden and E. saligna Smith) and seven treatments, with variation of containers and substrates, with four replicates, constituted by four plants. At two months, the cuttings were evaluated considering their root collar diameter, height, number, length and superficial area of emitted roots, and system root deformations. The plants originated of stecklings produced in pressed blocks presented better performance than the tubes ones. The root deformations caused by containers persist after the nursery stage.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0bed639cad9535cfe49e627df5a451cfa44b5a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Silva
- Danilo Simões
- M. G. D. Silva
Citations in the corpus
- Qualidade de mudas clonais de Eucalyptus urophylla x E. grandis em função do substrato (2012, background): “Segundo Freitas et al. (2005), a persistência das deformações radiculares após o plantio e o plantio de mudas menores em função da restrição no viveiro, podem reduzir ou atrasar o crescimento das plantas no campo, o que acarretaria maiores custos com o controle de plantas R. Bras.”