Statistics and Quantitative Risk Management for Banking and Insurance
By Paul Embrechts, Marius Hofert. 2014
66 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0b132db6cb75bc5e18851a7e79d0913b45534e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Fabio Bellini
- Emanuela Rosazza Gianin
- Alfred Müller
- Bernhard Klar
- J. Ziegel
- Tobias Fissler
- Marco Frittelli
- Hans Föllmer
In Finance
- J. Ziegel
- Fabio Bellini
- Tobias Fissler
- Emanuela Rosazza Gianin
- Bernhard Klar
- Alfred Müller
- James W. Taylor
- Long Jiang
Citations in the corpus
- Estimation of tail risk based on extreme expectiles (2016, unknown): “Likewise, z XES ‹ pτ 1 nq and Ć XES ‹ pτ 1 nq in (17) as well as z XES : pτ 1 nq and Ć XES : pτ 1 nq in (18), with τ 1 n “ p τ 1 npαnq, estimate the same expected shortfall XESpτ 1 npαnqq ” QESpαnq as the quantilebased estimator z QES ‹ pαnq described in (28).”
- Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle (2015, background): “These results may lead to a new direction in the contemporary discussion about what risk measure is best in practice, and in particular about the importance of elicitability in risk measurement contexts (Embrechts and Hofert, 2014; Emmer et al., 2013; Davis, 2013; Acerbi and Szekely, 2014).”
- Generalized Quantiles as Risk Measures (2014, methodology): “…for a functional that is defined by means of a similar loss minimization process; the relevance of elicitability in connection with backtesting has been recently addressed by Embrechts and Hofert (2013) while the relationship between coherency and elicitability has been considered in Ziegel (2013).”