Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review of the Concept
By Ana María Peredo, Murdith Mclean. 2006
289 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b092a6552ebbf288cf3bdcd0991b1600f8316784
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
Citations in the corpus
- Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises (2018, unknown): “1177/0149206318793196Journal of ManagementSaebi et al. / Social Entrepreneurship Research—Achievements and Promises research-article2018 marginalized, or suffering and are themselves not capable of changing this situation (e.g., Peredo & McLean, 2006; Seelos & Mair, 2005; Thompson, 2002).”
- Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, background): “…as willingness to innovate (Katre and Salipante, 2012; Austin, Stevenson, & Wei-Skillern, 2006; Mair & Marti, 2006; Dees, 1998), the drive to bear risk (Zahra et al., 2009; Peredo & McLean, 2006), and proactive behaviour toward growth, survival, and serving the market (Weerawardena & Mort, 2006).”
- Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development (2020, background): “In these ends, an entrepreneur’s choice to deploy a for-profit or nonprofit model may hinge upon the focal social need and the nature of the opportunity by which the firm can capture some of the produced value to survive ( Peredo & McLean, 2006 ).”