Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate

By G. Hecken, J. Bastiaensen, Catherine Windey. 2015

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0923e8e2dea2824351f5e4a60ce422c08674c42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. R. Fletcher
2. Bram Büscher

In Global and Planetary Change

1. R. Fletcher
2. Bram Büscher
3. E. Corbera

Citations in the corpus

• The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, methodology): “Advocating a strongly ‘actor-oriented’ approach in studies of both PES (Van Hecken et al., 2015a, b) and neoliberal conservation generally (Brock 2015), therefore, risks obscuring the overarching structural dynamics that influence actors' decisions and shape the outcomes of their actions in often…”