Extracting spatial-temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decomposition.

By Bingni W. Brunton, Lise A. Johnson, Jeffrey G. Ojemann, J. Nathan Kutz. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2014

486 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND There is a broad need in neuroscience to understand and visualize large-scale recordings of neural activity, big data acquired by tens or hundreds of electrodes recording dynamic brain activity over minutes to hours. Such datasets are characterized by coherent patterns across both space and time, yet existing computational methods are typically restricted to analysis either in space or in time separately. NEW METHOD Here we report the adaptation of dynamic mode decomposition (DMD), an algorithm originally developed for studying fluid physics, to large-scale neural recordings. DMD is a modal decomposition algorithm that describes high-dimensional dynamic data using coupled spatial-temporal modes. The algorithm is robust to variations in noise and subsampling rate; it scales easily to very large numbers of simultaneously acquired measurements. RESULTS We first validate the DMD approach on sub-dural electrode array recordings from human subjects performing a known motor task. Next, we combine DMD with unsupervised clustering, developing a novel method to extract spindle networks during sleep. We uncovered several distinct sleep spindle networks identifiable by their stereotypical cortical distribution patterns, frequency, and duration. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS DMD is closely related to principal components analysis (PCA) and discrete Fourier transform (DFT). We may think of DMD as a rotation of the low-dimensional PCA space such that each basis vector has coherent dynamics. CONCLUSIONS The resulting analysis combines key features of performing PCA in space and power spectral analysis in time, making it particularly suitable for analyzing large-scale neural recordings.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b08b71828179ebd541b9da3c5e068406fc3f2070

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Steven L. Brunton
  2. J. Nathan Kutz
  3. Krishna V. Shenoy
  4. Joshua L. Proctor
  5. Saurabh Vyas
  6. Igor Mezi'c
  7. Matthew D. Golub
  8. David Sussillo

Citations in the corpus