Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department.

By P. Bijur, Clarke Latimer, E. Gallagher. Academic Emergency Medicine, 2003

904 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b07c45808c7b81765a86fb52ffcfac9f7f8d6507

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

1. O. Dikme
2. Ozlem Dikme
3. O. Karcioglu
4. H. Topacoglu

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. O. Dikme
2. Ozlem Dikme
3. O. Karcioglu
4. H. Topacoglu

Citations in the corpus

• A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? (2018, methodology): “[36] 108 adult ED patients C H To assess the comparability of the NRS and VAS as measures of acute pain, and to identify the minimum clinically significant difference in pain that”
• Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale (2004, result): “0% of the baseline scores is also comparable and consistent with the MCID determined in the emergency department settings (Bijur et al., 2003; Bird and Dickson, 2001; Gallagher et al., 2001), and in patients with chronic respiratory diseases or chronic heart failure, where dyspnea, fatigue, and emot”