Graph distances using graph union
By W. Wallis, P. Shoubridge, M. Kraetzl, D. Ray. 2001
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Barnab'as P'oczos
- Jeff Schneider
- Willie Neiswanger
- Kirthevasan Kandasamy
- Eric P. Xing
- Michael A. Osborne
- Makoto Yamada
- Colin White
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Willie Neiswanger
- Barnab'as P'oczos
- Jeff Schneider
- Makoto Yamada
- Michael A. Osborne
- Kirthevasan Kandasamy
- Eric P. Xing
- Vu Nguyen
In Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Neural Architecture Search with Bayesian Optimisation and Optimal Transport (2018, background): “The above work either define the distance/kernel between vertices or assume the same vertex (layer) set [9, 20, 26, 35, 46], none of which apply in our setting.”
- Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs (2004, unknown): “Hence, graph-matching approaches based on topology without using geometrical information [8], [50] are not applicable for shock graph matching. on the shock graph in the discrete domain.”
- Optimal Transport Kernels for Sequential and Parallel Neural Architecture Search (2020, background): “Previous work considers the neural network architectures as the graphs, then defining various distances and kernels on graphs (Messmer & Bunke, 1998; Wallis et al., 2001; Kondor & Lafferty, 2002; Smola & Kondor, 2003; Gao et al., 2010; Ru et al., 2021).”