Landscape structure analysis of Kansas at three scales

By J. Griffith, E. Martinko, K. Price. 2000

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency (2008, background): “…by a parsimonious suite of independent metrics (e.g., McGarigal and McComb, 1995; Riitters et al., 1995; Cain et al., 1997; Scanes and Bunce, 1997; Tinker et al., 1998; Griffith et al., 2000; Lausch and Herzog, 2002; Cifaldi et al., 2004; Linke and Franklin, 2006; Schindler et al., 2008).”
The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes (2007, unknown): “It is a relatively unbiased methodology that will identify redundancy and it has been used to explore landscapes at different scales of thematic resolution, spatial resolution and spatial extent (e.g. Cain et al. 1997; Griffith et al. 2000).”