Features, Syntax, and Categories in the Latin Perfect

By David Embick. Linguistic Inquiry, 2000

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP (2009, background): “2 The terminal node may be originally syntactic (i.e. have originated as part of the Numeration and been added to the structure via syntactic Merge), or inserted as a ‘dissociated’ morpheme/terminal node at Morphology, prior to vocabulary insertion (see, e.g. Embick 2000).”
On the Status of Stems in Morphological Theory (2003, methodology): “An analysis of Latin participles in terms of the underspecification of piecebased Vocabulary Items is sketched in Embick (2000).”
Distributed Morphology and the Syntax—Morphology Interface (2007, background): “assumption we follow results from Embick (2000) ; see also Chomsky (2001) for some discussion.”
The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation (2007, background): “called l-morphemes) are inserted into syntactic trees early on, phonological material and all (see, for example, Embick, 2000 ).”