QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD
By Benjamin Bruening. Linguistic Inquiry, 2001
222 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Studies, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0508f5f6142302b3610f31670464c7436ecfcbb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Cultural Studies
In Language and Linguistics
- Tatiana Nikitina
- Joan Bresnan
- Michael Wagner
- S. Miyagawa
- J. Legate
- Takae Tsujioka
- Ž. Bošković
- Mark C. Baker
Citations in the corpus
- Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese (2004, methodology): “A more recent approach by Marantz (1993), extended by Harley (1995), Bruening (2001) and Pylkkänen (2002), builds on Larson's "VP shell" idea.”
- Association by movement: evidence from NPI-licensing (2007, background): “I gave a doll to each child a > each, each > a The explanation that Bruening (2001) proposes is that althoug both arguments can undergo LF-movement, in the case of the DO-construction, the lower one cannot 12I assume that in cases where ‘only’ associates withbotharguments, either they stay in-situ,…”
- The Gradience of the Dative Alternation (2008, background): “The phenomenon of scope-freezing in ditransitives (Aoun and Li 1989, Bruening 2001) is probably an instance of the same generalization.”
- Some Interface Properties of the Phase (2003, background): “5 See Bruening 2001 for arguments that QR obeys Superiority.”