A generating mechanism for apparent fluid slip in hydrophobic microchannels
By D. Tretheway, C. Meinhart. 2004
280 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b05038211cd9acc69a08eb0e460e460ca2aec513
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- T. Squires
- Stephen R. Quake
- Howard A. Stone
- Eric Lauga
- Michael P. Brenner
- Taha Sochi
- George M. Whitesides
- Martin Z. Bazant
In Computational Mechanics
In Water Science and Technology
- Howard A. Stone
- Michael P. Brenner
- Taha Sochi
- Stephen R. Quake
- T. Squires
- Eric Lauga
- Chiang Juay Teo
- Boo Cheong Khoo
Citations in the corpus
- Slip at Fluid-Solid Interface (2011, methodology): “Anyway, even if hydrophobicity was a sufficient condition for slip it is not a necessary condition, as wall slip can occur on hydrophilic surfaces as well as hydrophobic surfaces [21, 22, 27, 39, 46, 48, 50, 89, 98, 148], and this should be particularly true for apparent slip.”
- Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale (2005, background): “…lubricate and alter the fluid flow, has been invoked for an explanation Ruckenstein and Rajora, 1983; Ruckenstein and Churaev, 1991; Vinogradova, 1995, 1996; de Gennes, 2002; Andrienko et al., 2003; Lauga and Stone, 2003; Yang et al., 2003; Lauga and Brenner, 2004; Tretheway and Meinhart, 2004 .”
- Microfluidics: The no-slip boundary condition (2005, methodology): “In this context, the large number of recent published experiments reporting some form of (apparent) slip with λ ∼ 1 nm−1 μm in the flow of Newtonian liquids is surprising [9, 16, 17, 18, 29, 30, 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, 67, 87, 88, 68, 108, 116, 125, 126, 150, 162, 163, 178, 192, 193, 194, 195], and has ”