A framework for priority effects
By T. Fukami, Erin A. Mordecai, A. Ostling. 2016
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0470468d634b88cdc949c13236b73f7c14b7a5f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Po‐Ju Ke
- Andrew D. Letten
- H. Lai
- Daniel B. Stouffer
- T. Fukami
- M. Mayfield
- Malyon D. Bimler
- Jizhong Zhou
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Po‐Ju Ke
- Andrew D. Letten
- H. Lai
- Daniel B. Stouffer
- T. Fukami
- M. Mayfield
- Malyon D. Bimler
- Jizhong Zhou
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Accurate predictions of coexistence in natural systems require the inclusion of facilitative interactions and environmental dependency (2018, background): “Fukami et al. (2016) and Ke and Letten (2018) link priority effects, which can be driven by facilitation, to niche overlap and MCT. Schreiber, Yamamichi, and Strauss (2017) modelled the effects of positive frequency dependence on plant fitness and highlighted the need to account for such…”
- Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory (2017, background): “Chesson (2008) has discussed the potential for negative stabilizing mechanisms, and more recently Mordecai (2011) provided a conceptual model for the integration of priority effects into Chesson’s framework (see also Fukami et al., 2016).”