The Effect of Density on the Height-Diameter Relationship
By B. Zeide, C. VanderSchaaf. 2002
58 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0315d13f9fed7b6e34c13139894bdecda3b51fb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Hann
- F. crecente-campo
- Aaron Weiskittel
- Benedicto Vargas-Larreta
- Margarida Tomé
- J. Castaño-Santamaría
- F. Castedo‐Dorado
- Marcos Barrio-Anta
Citations in the corpus
- A generalized nonlinear mixed-effects height-diameter model for Eucalyptus globulus L. in northwestern Spain. (2010, background): “Stand density is the most obvious factor affecting the h–d relationship in a stand (Zhang et al., 1997; Zeide and Vanderschaaf, 2002): in dense stands, trees of the same diameter are usually taller than those in less dense stands.”
- A generalized height–diameter model with random coefficients for uneven-aged stands in El Salto, Durango (Mexico) (2009, background): “As many authors have stated (e.g. Zhang et al. , 1997 ; Zeide and Vanderschaaf, 2002 ), stand density is the most obvious factor that affects the h-d relationship, particularly for trees grown in mixedwood stands ( Huang and Titus, 1994 ): more dense stands tend to result in taller trees…”
- Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests (2008, background): “The results are in agreement with those of several recent studies that have included relative position and (or) stand density in the base regional height–diameter equation (e.g., Zeide and Vanderschaaf 2001; Temesgen and von Gadow 2004; Sharma and Zhang 2004; Castedo et al. 2006).”
- Regional mixed-effects height–diameter models for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations (2007, unknown): “The process of calibration apparently accounted indirectly for the effects of stand density on the height– diameter relationships (e.g., Zeide and VanderSchaaf 2002).”
- Tree height prediction approaches for uneven-aged beech forests in northwestern Spain (2013, background): “This confirms that a single h–d local model is not adequate for all possible situations found within and between stands, since the h–d relationship usually varies with site quality, stand density, relative position of trees within the stand and also over time (Curtis, 1967; Sharma and Zhang, 2004; T”