Special symposium: In vitro plant recalcitrance recalcitrance of woody and herbaceous perennial plants: Dealing with genetic predeterminism

By B. Mccown. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2000

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Special symposium: In vitro plant recalcitrance do free radicals have a role in plant tissue culture recalcitrance? (2000, background): “Clearly, for a large number of in vitro systems, recalcitrance is caused by alternative, but major, factors such as genetic predeterminism (see McCown, 2000).”
The effect of salt stress and abscisic acid on proline production, chlorophyll content and growth of in vitro propagated shoots of Eucalyptus camaldulensis (2005, methodology): “The cultures had been stabilised (McCown, 2000) through continuous subculture for at least 18 months before these experiments were conducted and three clones were used; 919 (salt sensitive), 66 (salt tolerant) and 502 (salt tolerant).”
In vitro propagation of Indian Kino (Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb.) using Thidiazuron (2007, background): “Many woody plant species (McCown, 2000) and particularly tree legumes are known for their recalcitrant nature of regeneration (Jha et al., 2004; Anis et al., 2005).”
Priming for transplant stress resistance in In vitro propagation (2003, background): “…information on priming stock plants prior to taking explants for culture initiation, and on dealing with recalcitrance in tissue-culture-based propagation (treatment of primary cultures to enhance the efficiency of the micropropagation system), see Pierik (1987), Benson (2000), and McCown (2000).”