Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs.

By Lennart Eriksson, Joanna Jaworska, Andrew Paul Worth, Mark T. D. Cronin, Robert M. McDowell, Paola Gramatica. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003

1,208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article provides an overview of methods for reliability assessment of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models in the context of regulatory acceptance of human health and environmental QSARs. Useful diagnostic tools and data analytical approaches are highlighted and exemplified. Particular emphasis is given to the question of how to define the applicability borders of a QSAR and how to estimate parameter and prediction uncertainty. The article ends with a discussion regarding QSAR acceptability criteria. This discussion contains a list of recommended acceptability criteria, and we give reference values for important QSAR performance statistics. Finally, we emphasize that rigorous and independent validation of QSARs is an essential step toward their regulatory acceptance and implementation.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Pharmacology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b02de6aa6f643d2f08effacca357a0d25dff293e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Igor V. Tetko
  2. Gennadiy Poda
  3. Joanna Jaworska
  4. N. Nikolova-Jeliazkova
  5. T. Aldenberg
  6. Pierre Bruneau
  7. Mark T. D. Cronin
  8. Hans-Werner Mewes

In Pharmacology

  1. Hans-Werner Mewes
  2. Igor V. Tetko
  3. Gennadiy Poda
  4. Pierre Bruneau
  5. Douglas C. Rohrer

Citations in the corpus