Biohashing: two factor authentication featuring fingerprint data and tokenised random number

842 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A survey of palmprint recognition (2009, background): “However, they assume [6] that the pseudo-random keys are never lost and shared and based on this assumption report zero equal error rates for different biometric traits [28].”
Generating Cancelable Fingerprint Templates (2007, background): “Further details may be found in [8], [22], [23], [25], [26].”
Multi-Factor Authentication: A Survey (2018, background): “Another challenge is that the use of biometrics relies on a binary decision mechanism [68].”
Edge Computing Security: State of the Art and Challenges (2019, background): “, fingerprints [158], face authentication [159], authentication code via SMS messages [160], graphic texts [161], or even ambient sound [162].”
A survey on biometric cryptosystems and cancelable biometrics (2011, background): “In other approaches the same group adopts BioHashing to several biometric characteristics including fingerprints [95], [96], iris biometrics [97], [98] as well as palmprints [99] and show how to apply generated hashes in generic key binding schemes [100], [101].”
Cancelable Biometrics: A review (2015, methodology): “bioHAsHiNg [35] fiNgerpriNt fvC 2002 (100) eer: ~ 0 fAr: 0”