Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality

By S. Reise, Wes Bonifay, Mark G. Haviland. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2013

1,002 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b01b3fb3bdc21226c765f5339d199059df2ca406

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. K. Neff
2. Marieke E. Timmerman
3. S. Reise

In Clinical Psychology

1. K. Neff
2. A Alexander Beaujean
3. S. Reise
4. Rob R. Meijer
5. Leslie K Anderson
6. Travis L. Osborne
7. J. Michonski
8. Jennifer H. R. Sayrs

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. K. Neff
2. A Alexander Beaujean
3. Rob R. Meijer
4. Mark G. Haviland
5. Marley W. Watkins
6. Leslie K Anderson
7. S. Welch
8. Travis L. Osborne

Citations in the corpus

• Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures (2016, background): “A straightforward measure of degree of essential unidimensionality is the ECV (Reise et al., 2013; Sijtsma, 2009; ten Berge & So can, 2004; Stucky & Edelen, 2014; Stucky et al., 2013).”
• The Dutch Symptom Checklist-90-Revised: Is the use of the subscales justified? (2015, methodology): “On the basis of the final hierarchical model, we computed for each scale the reliability as the proportion of variance of the scale involved accounted for by all factors (xk; see e.g., Brunner & Süb, 2005; Raykov, 2004; Reise et al., 2013; Zinbarg, Revelle, Yovel, & Li, 2005).”
• Exploratory bifactor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition with the 16 primary and secondary subtests (2015, background): “These results provide little justification for the clinical interpretation of group factors or their manifestations in the surplus of index scores and comparisons that can be calculated from the WISC-V subtests (Reise, 2012; Reise et al., 2013).”
• Factor Structure of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in Adult Outpatients Receiving Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) (2017, background): “Our values ofωHS = .34 (Goals) and .36 (Impulse) are slightly higher but fall short of the minimum tentative benchmark offered by Reise et al. (2013) of .50.”
• The Self-Compassion Scale is a Valid and Theoretically Coherent Measure of Self-Compassion (2016, methodology): “Another psychometric approach is a bi-factor model (Reise et al. 2010, 2013), which is designed to assess the multidimensionality of psychological measures.”