Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow
By Jonathan B. Warner. The European Legacy, 2020
276 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b00dfd08279583aa969b69176eac599d4b7afa0e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
- K. Wilén
- Kristian Klockars
- Tim Jackson
- M. Sandberg
- João J. M. Ferreira
- L. Akenji
- Pedro Mota Veiga
- Cristina I. Fernandes
In Political Science and International Relations
- K. Wilén
- Kristian Klockars
- Tim Jackson
- M. Sandberg
- João J. M. Ferreira
- L. Akenji
- Pedro Mota Veiga
- N. Eisenmenger
Citations in the corpus
- Green growth or degrowth? Assessing the normative justifications for environmental sustainability and economic growth through critical social theory (2019, methodology): “Thus, degrowth argues for the need in developed countries to radically change consumption patterns, and in particular, reduce consumption levels (Jackson, 2016; Lorek and Fuchs, 2013; Lorek and Spangenberg, 2014).”
- The Post-growth Challenge: Secular Stagnation, Inequality and the Limits to Growth (2019, background): “…that has passed since the financial crisis of 2008, there has been a much more pronounced resurgence of interest in the growth critique from a variety of different perspectives (D'Alisa et al., 2014; O'Neill et al., 2018; Jackson, 2009, 2017; Raworth, 2017; Fioramonti, 2015; Victor, 2008/2018).”
- Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? (2021, background): “Green growth brings about structural changes in the organization and behavior of business and society, including substantial reductions in the levels of unsustainable production and consumption in developed countries (D'Alisa, Demaria, & Kallis, 2015; Jackson, 2016; Ripple et al., 2017).”
- Household time use, carbon footprints, and urban form: a review of the potential contributions of everyday living to the 1.5 °C climate target (2018, background): “Controversy surrounds the validity of these statements across very different working practices (standard working hours, single or dual earner models, teleworking, shared workspaces); impacts across socioeconomic groups, especially on lower-income households; the emissions implications of alternative”
- Material Flow Accounting: Measuring Global Material Use for Sustainable Development (2017, background): “These vital policy changes still operate within a green growth paradigm, and some scholars have asked for more fundamental social and institutional transformations that go beyond growth (125) while still maintaining high employment, lowering inequality, and reducing financial instability (155).”