Disability in Theory

By T. Siebers. 2006

536 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afe977aad6f5581f5394c2c71158b8830b37b10e

Citations in the corpus

• The Bodymind Problem and the Possibilities of Pain (2015, unknown): “My understanding of materialist feminist DS draws upon work by Liz Crow, Anna Mollow, Tom Shakespeare, Tobin Siebers, Tanya Titchkosky, and Nirmala Erevelles (Crow 1996; Mollow 2006; Shakespeare 2006; Siebers 2008; Erevelles 2011; Titchkosky 2011).”
• Conceptualizations of Students With and Without Disabilities in Educational Research in Mathematics; A Critical Review (2017, unknown): “In one article from the sample, Múñez, Orrantia and Rosales [68] describe their participants as follows, “Participants were 50 students from a public secondary school in a middle-class suburb.”
• Disability Studies: What is it and what Difference does it Make? (2012, unknown): “Indeed, much recent writing has urged renewed attention to the "embodiment" of disability (Finger, 2006; Shakespeare, 2006; Siebers, 2008).”
• The (In)validity of Supercrip Representation of Paralympian Athletes (2012, unknown): “Siebers (2008) stresses the disabled person is seen as the “other other that helps make otherness imaginable” (p. 48).”