“New” lunar meteorites: Implications for composition of the global lunar surface, lunar crust, and the bulk Moon

By P. Warren. 2005

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afe72b514288af46a65747e4a39cdc80c74dd169

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Amir Khan
2. L. Schaefer
3. J. A. Connolly
4. B. Fegley
5. J. Orman
6. Klaus Mosegaard
7. M. Rutherford
8. E. Hauri

In Geophysics

1. Amir Khan
2. E. Hauri
3. L. Schaefer
4. J. A. Connolly
5. B. Fegley
6. J. Orman
7. Klaus Mosegaard
8. M. Rutherford

Citations in the corpus

• Joint inversion of seismic and gravity data for lunar composition and thermal state (2007, methodology): “Previous bulk compositions obtained from geochemical (Taylor 1982; Warren 2005) as well as geophysical modelling (Kuskov & Kronrod 1998) and that of the Earth’s upper mantle (McDonough & Sun 1995) have been included for comparison.”
• Water in the Moon's interior: Truth and consequences (2015, methodology): “This supposition is supported by the more extensive petrologic arguments of Warren (2005), Ringwood (1992) and Taylor and Wieczorek (2014) who reached the same conclusion for major elements and 27 refractory lithophile elements (FeO excepted); in our case, we assume a terrestrial FeO content, but…”
• CHEMISTRY OF SILICATE ATMOSPHERES OF EVAPORATING SUPER-EARTHS (2009, methodology): “We used a number of starting compositions, including: the Earth’s continental and oceanic crusts, the bulk silicate Earth (BSE), and the bulk silicate Moon (Wedepohl 1995, Klein 2005, O’Neill & Palme 1998, Warren 2005).”