RESEARCH: "Consequences of a Multidimensional Approach to Religion for the Relationship Between Religiosity and Value Priorities"

By Johnny Fontaine, B. Duriez, P. Luyten, J. Corveleyn, D. Hutsebaut. 2005

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afdaad9d7879ab44bc6e356698b66d71e59b6a4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

1. V. Saroglou
2. B. Duriez
3. T. Schnell
4. D. P. Sullins
5. R. Hood
6. Claire Prade
7. Joanna Blogowska
8. Sonia Roccas

In Social Psychology

1. V. Saroglou
2. B. Duriez
3. Claire Prade
4. T. Schnell

In Sociology and Political Science

1. V. Saroglou
2. B. Duriez
3. D. P. Sullins
4. R. Hood
5. Claire Prade
6. Sonia Roccas
7. T. Schnell

Citations in the corpus

• Are religious people nicer people? Taking a closer look at the religion–empathy relationship (2004, background): “…such as racism (Duriez, in press-a; Duriez & Hutsebaut, 2000; Duriez et al., 2000, 2002), right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance (Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002), moral competence and moral attitudes (Duriez, in press-b), and value orientations (Duriez et al., 2001; Fontaine et al., 2003).”
• Religion's role in prosocial behavior: Myth or reality? (2006, background): “…tend to compare, for instance, extrinsic with intrinsic religious orientation, intrinsic with quest religion, fundamentalism with quest religion, or literal with symbolic religious thinking (e.g., Batson et al., 1999, 2001, 2005; Duriez, 2004; Fontaine et al., 2005; Goldfried & Miner, 2002).”