Evidence and argumentation: A reply to Everett (2009)

By A. Nevins, D. Pesetsky, C. Rodrigues. 2009

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This discussion note is a brief response to Everett (2009, E09), which was a reply to our assessment (Nevins, Pesetsky, & Rodrigues 2009, NPR but if they are correct nonetheless, they weaken rather than strengthen the case against embedding. We conclude with a discussion of comparable questions of argumentation and evidence that arise elsewhere in E09, and the relevance of these issues to the public discussion of CA's claims.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afb75c76271b33ba7367d766554d6cf384207053